A subtle denial of ownership is innocence and indifference. The future is denied with the response, “It doesn’t matter to me—whatever you want to do is fine.” This is always a lie and just a polite way of avoiding a difficult conversation around ownership. People best create that which they own, and co-creation is the bedrock of accountability. The ownership conversation most directly deals with the belief that each of us, perhaps even from the moment of birth, is cause, not effect. The leadership task is to find a way to use this conversation to confront people with their freedom.[1]
It is vulnerable to accept responsibility when we cannot always control all the variables for success. We often avoid the vulnerability of taking responsibility with polite dismissals. What is one thing that you have taken responsibility for in this season of your life that leaves you vulnerable? Is it a work relationship, a neighbor relationship, perhaps the precarious relationship that a loved one or child is in with their work or friendships. Notice this, and claim this decision to engage without guaranteed outcomes.
Does anyone else know that you’ve made that decision? Find a way to share with someone today the isolation you might feel in being unable to control the outcome, and yet choosing to be a cause and not simply an effect.
[1]Block, Peter. Community: The Structure of Belonging (intro, and pp. 127). Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Kindle Edition
Accountability is the willingness to acknowledge that we have participated in creating, through commission or omission, the conditions that we wish to see changed. Without this capacity to see ourselves as cause, our efforts become either coercive or wishfully dependent on the transformation of others.
The possibility conversation frees us to be pulled by a new future. The distinction is between a possibility, which lives into the future, and problem solving, which makes improvements on the past. This distinction takes its value from an understanding that living systems are propelled by the force of the future, and possibility as we use it here (thank you, Werner) is one way of speaking of the future.
Hospitality, the welcoming of strangers, is the essence of a restorative community. Historically, if strangers knocked at your door, you automatically invited them in. They would be fed and offered a place to sleep, even if they were your enemies. As long as they were in your house, they were safe from harm. They were treated as if they belonged, regardless of the past. This is the context of restoration we are seeking. Our hospitality begins with the invitation.
The shift is to believe that the task of leadership is to provide context and produce engagement, to tend to our social fabric. It is to see the leader as one whose function is to engage groups of people in a way that creates accountability and commitment. In this way of thinking we hold leadership to three tasks:
You must be logged in to post a comment.